Friday, May 18, 2012

Posts Tagged ‘Boomers’

Boomer Perspective: Moment of Truth

One sees great things from the valley, only small things from the peak.
—Chesterton

While aging is inevitable, arriving at a healthy perspective about its meaning and potential is not. In our youth-oriented culture, middle age more often than not is portrayed as embarrassing stage of life that is in desperate need of enhancements to stave off the signs of being older. But Botox® and hair transplants can not hold the line forever and at some point thoughts and feelings about aging have to be sorted out at a deeper level, a realty check on what it really means to be older. The outcome of this “aging moment of truth” will have a profound influence on the quality of life for middle age adults. It will either reframe the journey as a continuation of growth and learning filled with unique potential, or see a darker landscape riddled with loss, regret, and limitations. This vantage point from which baby boomers will judge the aging process is called perspective.

Perspective provides a “filter” through which life experiences are assessed, organized, and ultimately judged. Youth has its own filter typified by an optimism found in the first half of life that keeps the metaphoric glass half full. It is a perspective that always sees another opportunity, another deal, or a fresh start that is not limited by health, family, or time. The first half perspective quickly converts setbacks into opportunities based on an unshakeable faith in the magnitude of possibilities that lie ahead. Middle age changes the filter.

Ushering in an era of external and internal upheavals, middle age introduces a different reality that undermines the sustainability of earlier optimism. What appeared unlimited now has restrictions and complications. The unspoken and yet pervasive cultural shame that sees aging as pathology leaves middle age adults holding a glass that is suddenly half empty. In this new environment, the first half perspective can undergo a rapid deterioration leading baby boomers to buy into a more cynical future. Without reframing, this is the anticipatory reality they are stuck with to manage being older. Ironically, this cultural anxiety about aging has no basis in biology or psychology. Growth and learning do not wane in middle age, and creative capacity is at an all time high. But the media’s slight of hand trick that obsesses over youth as the ultimate consumer class delivers a convincing message about the downhill trajectory of the second half of life. This dysfunctional perspective is a trap for middle age adults pointing them developmentally backwards to a phase that is over while distracting and devaluing the rich and immediate next phase on which so much is riding. Avoiding this unhealthy entrapment requires a different type of inquiry into being older. We call this inquiry The Perspective Inventory™.

As a reframing tool, The Perspective Inventory™ allows middle age adults to “test” the critical questions that ask themselves and others about the aging process. As Dr. Marilee Adams succinctly argues in her book Change Your Questions, Change Your Life, questions are the raw material of how individuals size up themselves and their world. They are the building blocks of perspective, the framing tools that either discover hope and opportunity or perpetuate endless cycles of conflict and despair. From a developmental perspective, questions are an ideal vehicle to examine and change concepts. They have the right linguistic packaging to emotionally override long-standing beliefs. They are receptive to the right brain, which has proven to be the informational gatekeeper for middle age and beyond. They are also emotionally generative and as such quickly alter cognition and change behavior. But the benefit of The Perspective Inventory™ is not simply to arrive at a better set of questions about being older, as valuable as they may be. The Perspective Inventory™ offers baby boomers a way to build a new filtering ritual so they can habitually reframe the experiences of aging to facilitate their developmental journey.

First and foremost The Perspective Inventory™ is an inquiry tool. It is allows middle age adults to organize and evaluate the quality of the questions they ask about the aging. It is based Dr. Adams’ premise that most people simply adopt a “questions style” without giving much thought to the impact it has on quality of their lives. Once internalized, these core questions become the ingrained filter for looking at people and experiences. With middle age, the impact question style intensifies in either a positive or negative way. Negative questions such as “Who’s to blame?” and “How can I prove I am right?” extract a heavy price on individuals and family systems. They negate prior success, shut down communication, and close off avenues of collaboration and growth. Even more concerning, they have the lethal potential to undermine confidence at a time in life where confidence is already in jeopardy. In contrast, aging friendly questions such as “What’s useful about this?” and “What’s possible?” lighten the emotional load on everyone. Not only do they facilitate communication but open up new channels of creativity, possibility, and growth. They help restore confidence and optimism to individuals and family systems.

The Perspective Inventory™ is also valuable resource for baby boomers as they engage the predictable dilemmas of their aging parents, experiences and situations that can leave both parties feeling frustrated, guilty, and anxious. Reframing questions surrounding the monumental family tasks of determining the right health care, sorting out living options, coping with the death of a spouse, untangling financial decisions, and coming to grips with the final goodbye can create a more effective and nurturing perspective. Developmentally tuned questions such as “what are the control issues here?” and “what other ways to look at this situation?” can help middle age adults keep their bearings in the midst of an emotional family landscape.

Finally, The Perspective Inventory™ reminds middle age adults that they can make positive alterations in the second half of life; they can opt for a radically different approach from the one they used in the first half. Moving into the upheaval of middle age asks two primary developmental questions:

1. How am I going to manage all this?
2. What is it I really want?

Successfully addressing these questions requires a perspective that is both personal and collective, is about self-fulfillment that is wrapped in a nurturing community of meaningful relationships. This is the heart of the need for authenticity. It is about finding personal clarity and not simply searching for another twenty years of approval or more of the same. For baby boomers that understand this potential, it comes as a welcome relief and an extraordinary opportunity to leverage their experience and education into an unlimited universe of choices and possibilities.

Conflicting Layers of Longevity

As boomers approach the outskirts of being old, a new aging dilemma is beginning to emerge: simultaneous developmental phases with their aging parents. It is one thing to be fifty-something and have aging parents in their mid to late seventies. Both parties are clearly situated in separate developmental phases. The fifty-something adult is navigating the tasks of middle age, preserving stability while at the same time orchestrating a new purpose and direction for the second half of life. Their aging parents, on the other hand, have different marching orders, preserving control in a world where all control is being lost while at the same time creating a legacy before time runs out. The challenge is to find an effective middle ground so both parties can successfully complete their developmental tasks. But what happens when adult children enter their late sixties and their aging parents are still alive, where both parties wind up in the last phase of life?

Seniority appears to be the rule of thumb. While adult child in their late sixties are beginning the battle for control and the search for legacy, these developmental needs are usually “put on hold” for the sake of the aging parent. Practicality dictates that both parties cannot be insisting on control as well as the airtime for life review, but the seniority accommodation is not as simple as it sounds.

Developmental needs are first and foremost embedded marching orders, which are involuntary, unconscious, and consumptive. They are background software for life-long human developmental and exert a pressing influence on perception, cognition, and behavior. When two generations share the same developmental zone, a new type of power struggle emerges over whose needs deserve priority. As with all generational conflicts, a middle ground is hard to find and hold.

The best course for adult children caught in this developmental simulcast is to make a selective course correction while their aging parents are still alive. This involves mapping out “control sustaining” strategies for their personal life (i.e. where to live, how to pay for it, how to manage health, how to foster community, etc.) while supporting their aging parent’s need to control their own destiny. It can awkward, confusing, and unsatisfying, but it defuses the unwinnable argument of entitlement. While everyone is entitled to address their developmental needs, in the context of families, this may require delay, compromise, and compassion for those who are going ahead.

Pulling the Cardiac Plug

Even the best laid plans of aging can fall apart. Katy Butler’s recent article in The New York Times, What Broke My Father’s Heart, tells a painful tale of the unwanted impact of medical technology in the last and most distressing phase of life (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/magazine/20pacemaker-t.html?pagewanted=1&ref=homepage&src=me).

But this is no ordinary article about a bad outcome involving aging parents. This is a seminal article about a new and quite sobering level of vigilance that attends our role with our aging parents. The rapidity of events and the ever present pressure of “medical necessity” in the last phase of life can push families into decisions they not only regret but, as Ms. Butler so eloquently and heroically portrays, resist our best efforts to unwind them. If there was ever an article on this subject to read in a quiet, non-distracted moment, this is surly the one…

Riptide: Excerpt from David Solie’s new book-Part 3

This is the third of three posts from my new book Riptide.

Primary Current Number Two: Internal Forces

While the external currents of the middle age challenge the capacity of boomers to handle complex and unpredictable life events, internal currents usher in an existential house cleaning that questions the purpose and meaning of the second half of life. Ironically, this involuntary reconsideration of the future comes at a time when so much has already been accomplished. But while boomer successes are a testimony to the faithful completion of the first-half life mission, they inadvertently lead to a developmental dilemma about what is to follow.

The mission of the first half of life is the steady pursuit of accomplishments, a long and noble list of all consuming life goals that are intense, quick paced, and well defined. Entering the first half of life stadium, young adults hear the cultural cheer of the rest of society encouraging them to on to greater accomplishments that include:

Growing up and taking their role in adult society
Getting an education as a prelude to a meaningful career
Finding a life partner to create a new family unit
Finding the right career to become successful
Starting a family to usher in the next generation of children and grandchildren
Becoming successful as a means to a secure future

As young adults immerse themselves in the first half of life journey, these goals are repeated at every turn in the questions they hear from family members, colleagues, and society as a whole. Did you get that apartment? Are you going to graduate school? Are things getting serious between you and her? Did you get that promotion? Are you two thinking about starting a family? Are you going to buy that house? The litany of goal-crafted questions offers definition, structure and much needed encouragement. The purpose and direction of the mission is never in question. But surprisingly and with little fanfare, the mission begins to change just at the point when so much has been done.

The second half of life journey does not share the same sociological advantage or clarity as the first half. Entering the second half of life stadium, boomers are surprised at how small the crowd has become and that it is surprisingly silent. Even more concerning is that the laundry list of first half goals has not been replaced by an equally compelling list of second half goals. In fact, goals have been replaced by social encouragements such as “you look good,” “stay healthy,” and “find something you enjoy.”

This surprising and disturbing loss of sociological scaffolding provokes an existential moment where boomers realize they have permanently moved into the “self-service” zone in terms of discovering their second half mission. While it is obvious that one set of goals is not enough for a lifetime, the question becomes what is the second set? Forced into an involuntary, midlife reinvention, boomers are unprepared to easily define the purpose and direction of the rest of their lives. Despite the unprecedented frenzy of modern life, part of them that feels adrift, eerily disconnected from the social agenda that has kept them on course for most of their adult life. Trying to resolve this dilemma is made more difficult by the tangible and unavoidable shadow of a sobering future. The futures of the past for middle age adults have always been multilayered, ten or twenty year segments that cascaded forward and offered ample “staring over” opportunities. The future of today’s boomers is smaller and time constrained, in most cases being played out before them by their aging parents. It is also less forgiving, with little room for error and or starting over. This time compressed future coincides with boomer’s new appreciation of their mortality.

Life and death is nothing new for boomers. Their generation ushered in a revolutionary social commentary on life and death issues that was markedly different from the generations that preceded them. But all the talk of life and death during the boomer’s youth was at an arms length from the humbling reality of middle age, a difference between discussing an illness and actually being diagnosed with it. Boomers are now living their mortality where the loss of parents, siblings, partners, and peers has created a new and sobering awareness of their own vulnerability. It is an experience that replaces the occasional tragedy of past where people were “gone too soon” with the more common occurrence of friends and family members simply passing away. This changes the urgency of the search for a new set of goals. Second half goals turn out not only to be a necessity for crafting a productive and meaningful life; they represent that last opportunity for most boomers to fulfill life long dreams and ambitions. It is a nagging reality that whispers to boomers, “if not now, when?’

The unsettling disorientation of the internal currents defines the second primary developmental task of middle age, which is to “discover purpose and direction for the second half of life.” This was the second hidden current that Linda did not see coming. Not only did her world become unstable, but also her role in this volatile landscape became unclear. It wasn’t a question of shrinking from her responsibilities; it was trying to determine what really mattered at this turning point in her life for the journey ahead.

These two tasks make up the mission of middle age: preserve stability and orchestrate reinvention. To do this boomers have to discover effective strategies to manage the onslaught of external currents while at the same time find purpose and meaning in their lives.

How do boomers navigate these formidable and intimidating currents? Is it simply the luck of the draw, with some having better outcomes than others? Or are there steps that boomers can take prior or during the riptide that can improve the quality of their journey. This is what Linda wanted to know. What needs to change to make things better? Fortunately there are strategies that improve boomer’s chances for a successful crossing. This is what the remainder of Riptide is about. It is about which navigational tools will help boomers successfully complete the mission of middle age and arrive well-prepared and ready for old age.

Navigation tools are designed to keep travelers on course. This is the goal of Riptide: keeping boomers on course. Understanding the currents of middle age is a critical first step, but knowing the developmental risk of middle age is only half the battle. Learning how to successfully navigate them is what determines outcome. Riptide presents boomers with a small but powerful group of navigational tools that are designed to keep them on course in the face of adversity and setbacks. All travelers will have difficult periods and their needs will change with changes in circumstances. The tools presented in Riptide arm boomers with the resources they need to overcome the challenges of aging. There were selected primarily on their ability to increase stability and facilitate reinvention. It not necessary for boomers to use all of them, only the ones that address their current navigational needs. As important, the themes of tools are familiar, topics boomers have heard from other sources as being important to preserving quality of life. What is different about Riptide is these themes have been reframed in terms of developmental utility, a unique approach that makes them “task friendly” and, as important, offers boomers new motivation to integrate them into their lives. It is an emotional reframing that resonates deeply with boomers offering them encouragement and much needed hope for the difficult stretches ahead.

Search

David Solie Updates

Sign Up for David Solie Updates

* Required field

*

*

*






Email Marketing by VerticalResponse

Communicate

No Money: No Comment

I was recently asked what to do about aging parents who had little or no savings but refused to discuss any aspect of their “money issue.” It reminded me that our role as adult children is not necessarily about problem solving; it is about compassionate containment. So many of the issues we feel compelled to “fix” have no clear answers. The best we can do is sort out what to accept from what we can actually change. Here was the advice I offered:

The issue of money, like so many other issues in the last phase of life, is about control. The best way to approach it is to reframe money as means of maintaining control. Lack of money takes away control. This link will take you to an article I authored on “communicating touch choices” that offers a practical strategy for how to do this:http://www.aging.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=2103&textonly=1

You may also want to consider three strategies that will help you “hedge” your parent’s financial risk:

1. Buy a long term care policy with a two years home care/two years nursing home benefit. This assumes they will cooperative with the process (i.e. signing the applications and answering questions).

2. Start funding a dedicated “side fund” for expenses that a long term care policy will not cover.

3. If you parents own their home, become familiar with how “reverse mortgages work and when they make sense.

Lastly, you need to began discussions with local area agencies on aging to determine what, if any, community resources can assist your parents if they run out of money.

This is a tough end-game, especially if you parents don’t want to talk about. The article will help you frame your conversations. Be patient but persistent in your discussions about control and your desire to help them maintain it.