Thursday, September 09, 2010

Posts Tagged ‘end of life conversations’

End of Life Conversations: From A Doctor’s Perspective

My wife Janet shared with me a very moving article about end of life conversations from a doctor’s perspective entitled: Talking Frankly at the End of Life. Here is the link.

One of the most important aspects of the article is the issue of telling the patient the truth about their medical condition. “Am I doing more harm than good?” the author asks from her physician point of view. She cites a recent study in JAMA that asked 300 terminal patients “if their doctors had ever discussed care at the end of life.” As important, after the patients died, the researchers looked at the type of care the patients received prior to death and then interviewed the caregivers six months after the death to see how they were adjusting.

The results indicated that the patients who discussed care at the end of life were more likely to have a better quality of life at the end of their lives. They were not more depressed. They had less aggressive medical interventions. They went to hospice earlier. As important, their caregivers fared better.

What we want to know at the end our life is a personal choice. We all want some version of the truth but in different degrees and different doses. The key is being offered, more than once, the opportunity to hear it from the person who holds so much sway over our lives: the doctor. It is a natural part of our leaving, the slow dance we all take to step away from this life, preserving our dignity and saying our final goodbyes. Ironically, to do this we may need to remind the doctors who take care of our aging parents as well as ourselves, it’s okay to talk about the end, more than once…

A New Kind Of Leaving

Before the advent of medical technology, leaving this life was fairly straight forward, though not always pleasant. The majority of interventions centered around comfort. That’s exactly what happened to my uncle Ed.

Uncle Ed was a bigger than life Norwegian fisherman with a red beard and an infectious flare for life. But out of nowhere, his robust life was brought to an end when he was diagnosed with terminal cancer and given only a few months to live. Wisely he retreated to the sanctuary of my grandmother’s house for his final days. The news of his leaving spread quickly in their immigrant community and a procession of family and friends began. They showed up at all hours to tell stories, drink beer, laugh, cry, pray and be part of his leaving. This daily ritual continued until he died.

Then they held his wake and for three days family and friends came to my grandmother’s house at all hours and told stories, drank beer, laughed, cried, prayed and comforted each other as well as his sister, my grandmother. Even as a child, I knew that this was the way to go, how I hoped my life might end, surrounded by the comfort of family and friends.

But leaving is not what it use to be given the reality of medical technology. A new metaphor has captured our focus and muddied our decisions about our aging parent’s final exit not to mention our own. Leaving has been usurped by lasting.

This shift in the balance of power at the end of life carries enormous consequences for adult children and their aging parents. Already feeling guilty about not doing enough, adult children are now confronted with a medical technology that haunts them with the question “is this where you stop?” Lasting has become the new benchmark for our collective efforts to fight the good fight. No one wants to let anyone down. While medicine is in the business of preserving life, no one really knows, amid machines, drugs, and heroic procedures that suspend leaving, when we have had enough.

This not a dilemma any of us can unwind; our generation owns it. But we can reframe how we think about the technology option to keep from being unfairly biased towards lasting at all costs. While the question of lasting, to what degree and at what cost, is vital to the discussion, an equally compelling question is “what is quality of the leaving?” This query reminds us that the final act is not just a battle against biology to extract more time, but a profound reconsideration of the entire journey. In leaving lies potentially the most important insights and conversations of a life time. As such, the question provides us a much needed counterbalance in the struggle to determine what is enough. It reduces the need for technological heroics to prove anything and champions low-tech conversations from the heart.

This is what uncle Ed’s passing taught me. It was the same lesson I was to learn years later in my medical career: cure when possible…comfort always. At middle age it becomes all to clear that there is no cure for leaving, and that the comfort of family and friends is what means the most to all of us.

No Money: No Comment

I was recently asked what to do about aging parents who had little or no savings but refused to discuss any aspect of their “money issue.” It reminded me that our role as adult children is not necessarily about problem solving; it is about compassionate containment. So many of the issues we feel compelled to “fix” have no clear answers. The best we can do is sort out what to accept from what we can actually change. Here was the advice I offered:

The issue of money, like so many other issues in the last phase of life, is about control. The best way to approach it is to reframe money as means of maintaining control. Lack of money takes away control. This link http://www.dsolie.com/articles/reframing.html will take you to an article I authored on “communicating touch choices” that offers a practical strategy for how to do this.

You may also want to consider three strategies that will help you “hedge” your parent’s financial risk:

1. Buy a long term care policy with a two years home care/two years nursing home benefit. This assumes they will cooperative with the process (i.e. signing the applications and answering questions).

2. Start funding a dedicated “side fund” for expenses that a long term care policy will not cover.

3. If you parents own their home, become familiar with how “reverse mortgages work and when they make sense.

Lastly, you need to began discussions with local area agencies on aging to determine what, if any, community resources can assist your parents if they run out of money.

This is a tough end-game, especially if you parents don’t want to talk about. The article will help you frame your conversations. Be patient but persistent in your discussions about control and your desire to help them maintain it.